<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winning a State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/08/winning-a-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/08/winning-a-state/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/08/winning-a-state/comment-page-1/#comment-126613</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2760#comment-126613</guid>
		<description>Much like the way it annoys me that her camp claims Texas as a win.

This nomination race is a race for delegates, no?

Obama took more delegates from Texas, due to the caucuses, so it seems to me at least that he won Texas.

Any other opinion falls, as does much of her recent rhetoric, under &#039;I would be the winner if we totally changed the rules.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like the way it annoys me that her camp claims Texas as a win.</p>
<p>This nomination race is a race for delegates, no?</p>
<p>Obama took more delegates from Texas, due to the caucuses, so it seems to me at least that he won Texas.</p>
<p>Any other opinion falls, as does much of her recent rhetoric, under &#8216;I would be the winner if we totally changed the rules.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

