Comments on: Quick Thoughts on CA Decision http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:46:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Daniel http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-126683 Daniel Thu, 15 May 2008 20:28:15 +0000 http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2778#comment-126683 Well, it's too late for what if's. I am so not looking forward to the next sixth months. Well, it’s too late for what if’s. I am so not looking forward to the next sixth months.

]]> By: Tin Man http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-126682 Tin Man Thu, 15 May 2008 20:17:26 +0000 http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2778#comment-126682 I guess they could have, had they been so inclined. I guess they could have, had they been so inclined.

]]> By: Daniel http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-126681 Daniel Thu, 15 May 2008 20:12:04 +0000 http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2778#comment-126681 OK. Couldn't they have arranged the order of their case load so that this issue wouldn't come up until after November? OK. Couldn’t they have arranged the order of their case load so that this issue wouldn’t come up until after November?

]]> By: Tin Man http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-126680 Tin Man Thu, 15 May 2008 19:35:56 +0000 http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2778#comment-126680 No - they were required to issue a decision within 90 days. No – they were required to issue a decision within 90 days.

]]> By: Daniel http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-126679 Daniel Thu, 15 May 2008 19:30:14 +0000 http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2778#comment-126679 The Presidential election, which was already guaranteed to be vicious, can now be expected to increse in acrimony a thousand fold. Couldn't they have waited on this ruling until after November? The Presidential election, which was already guaranteed to be vicious, can now be expected to increse in acrimony a thousand fold.

Couldn’t they have waited on this ruling until after November?

]]> By: Eric http://www.tinmanic.com/archives/2008/05/15/quick-thoughts-on-ca-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-126678 Eric Thu, 15 May 2008 18:38:20 +0000 http://www.tinmanic.com/?p=2778#comment-126678 I also have to have a little hope that Schwarzenegger's stance opposing the amendment will carry a lot of weight. Certainly national figures like Pelosi will (I hope) come out against the amendment and having the Republican poster boy for foreign-born presidents suddenly saying he would oppose the amendment can only be good for us. Right? Now someone tell the NYS Apellate court (or whichever is highest here) to rethink their decision. I also have to have a little hope that Schwarzenegger’s stance opposing the amendment will carry a lot of weight. Certainly national figures like Pelosi will (I hope) come out against the amendment and having the Republican poster boy for foreign-born presidents suddenly saying he would oppose the amendment can only be good for us.
Right?
Now someone tell the NYS Apellate court (or whichever is highest here) to rethink their decision.

]]>