The Massachusetts House of Representatives voted yesterday to repeal the 1913 law that prevents out-of-state couples from getting married in Massachusetts if their home state would bar the marriage. The state senate passed the law a couple of weeks ago, and the governor plans to sign it. Under existing law, same-sex couples can get married in Massachusetts only if same-sex marriage is legal in their home state. Many people think the law was originally passed to prevent interracial marriages. The repeal will allow many more same-sex couples to come to Massachusetts and get married.
Kris Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, said that this House vote is “eroding the people’s right to define marriage.”
It’s funny:
When a court rules that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry, the court is apparently infringing on the legislature’s job — even though the court is doing its job under the constitution.
When a legislature votes to allow same-sex marriage, this somehow infringes on the right of the people — even though legislators are the people’s duly-elected representatives.
When the actual people vote down a marriage amendment, as happened in Arizona two years ago, somehow that’s not legitimate and there needs to be a revote.
These people don’t care about “the people’s right” at all. All they care about is getting rid of icky homosexuals. And somehow they think banning same-sex marriage is going to do that.
Because, you know, homosexuals didn’t exist until same-sex marriage became legal in Massachusetts in 2004.