I Me My

The Emily Gould essay has got me thinking deeply about first-person writing, and it’s made me very self-conscious about it. The closest metaphor I can come up with is, if you loved ice cream, and then you watched someone binge on ice cream until they got sick, and it made you never, ever want to eat ice cream again. I almost never again want to blog the words I, me, or my, even though I’ve done it many times in this paragraph.

I think most of our brains have a gate between the part that thinks and the part that thinks about our thinking. Most of us mostly live in the part that thinks. But my brain’s gate has always been permeable. Years of therapy have helped break that gate down, although I was like this even before therapy. I am often too aware of my thinking, to the point where my thoughts pile up and trip over each other, and I can’t articulate anything because while I’m formulating the words, new thoughts are already forming about what I’m saying. I form counterarguments almost as soon as I form arguments, preemptively judging myself and my arguments so nobody else does it first. I’d rather hit myself with the bludgeon than let someone else do it.

That’s one of my problems — I often think there’s someone with a bludgeon when there isn’t.

So my thinking gets very self-referential and I start to feel like I’m living in a schematic drawing of my life instead of just living. There are other people like this. I used to think it was just me.

A person cannot make a living writing these days. I’m trying to realize that. I’ve long known it. But it’s even more true today, when anyone can have a blog and share their thoughts about anything — their life, politics, culture. The barrier is lower than it ever was. Unfortunately, writing is something I love to do. The only thing I love to do as much as writing is learning. And you can’t make a living learning.

There are people out there who are content not to be ambitious. They’re happy with their lives. They don’t have grand expectations. I wish I were like that.

But wishing is futile. Perhaps there’s a way that I can be like that. I don’t know if there is, but maybe.

NY to Recognize Same-Sex Unions from Elsewhere

State agencies in New York are going to recognize same-sex marriages performed outside the state, thanks to a decision by Gov. David Paterson. “The revisions are most likely to involve as many as 1,300 statutes and regulations in New York governing everything from joint filing of income tax returns to transferring fishing licenses between spouses,” according to the Times.

This is great news, but there are a couple of interesting things about it. One, the governor’s office issued a directive announcing the new policy on May 14 (the day before the California court decision, incidentally). Why did it take two weeks to get reported? The article states that the governor discussed the move in a videotaped message to a dinner of gay community leaders on May 17. (Here’s the video and text of the message.) So the people at the dinner knew about it. Why didn’t the Times, or any other news organization, report it until now?

The other interesting thing is the question of where the legal authority comes from. As much as I think it’s a great decision, at first it seemed odd to me that the governor could just do this unilaterally. Isn’t it such a big deal that the legislature should get involved?

But I realized it’s not. A state appellate court ruled on February 1 that there’s no reason not to recognize valid same-sex marriages performed out of state; state policy is to recognize any marriage validly performed out of state unless there’s a state law prohibiting it, and New York has no law prohibiting same-sex marriages. (Here’s the court decision.) If the legislature cared about banning same-sex marriage, it could have followed the lead of the numerous other states that have done so. But it hasn’t.

This is a beautiful move on the governor’s part. Because even though it’s a big deal for same-sex couples that want to get married, and even though it might seem like a big deal to people who think the world will fall apart if same-sex couples can get married, it’s just a run-of-the-mill policy interpretation. The governor is showing that it’s really not a big deal to just go ahead and treat people equally.

Hopefully the Republican-controlled state senate will realize this as well and stop blocking a marriage equality law.