Fernand Braudel

The acknowledgments in the front of Neal Stephenson’s Quicksilver, which I’m currently reading, include a reference to Fernand Braudel. I’d never heard of him before, so I looked him up.

Beneath the rapid succession of events on a human scale, which the historian likens to ripples on the ocean’s surface, Fernand Braudel attempts to charter a course through deeper waters to find the slower currents typical of the history of human groups relating to their environment, the structures that shape societies, be it essential trading and sailing routes or mentalities.

This led me to think: what era do we live in? There are many ways to think about it. We could say that we live in:

– the post-9/11 world

– the Internet era

– the world made by the countercultural movement

– the post-World War II era

– the age of electricity

– the age of democracy (begun in the 1770’s)

– the modern era (begun in the Renaissance)

– the era of human civilization (begun 5,000 years ago?)

– the era of homo sapiens

And even further back.

We’re all really just specks in the grand scale of things. Sometimes it’s good to step back from the day-to-day events in the news and get some perspective on those slower, deeper currents that we rarely notice.

Bush Backs Condoms

Bush Backs Condom Use to Prevent Spread of AIDS

Well, I wasn’t expecting that.

Mr. Bush has mentioned condom use at least once before, last July, in Entebbe, Uganda. But mentioning it in a domestic context is quite different.

“I can’t believe the president actually used the C-word,” said Amy Coen, the president of Population Action International, which has long backed birth control and AIDS prevention in underdeveloped countries. “That’s not one that comes easily to him. But it’s one thing to use the word and another thing to actually fund it.”

One can hope.

Supreme Court Cases

This is the time of year that Supreme Court geeks love: the end of the term, when the biggest decisions of the year are announced.

There are two possible reasons why they save the big cases for the end: either those cases require the most time to decide and write, or the Justices want to get the heck out of Dodge before anyone can question them.

For me, nothing this year can compare to the anticipation and excitement I felt for Lawrence v. Texas last year (the one-year anniversary is this Saturday), but of this term’s remaining cases (the Cheney energy case decision was announced today), there are still some important ones: the terrorism/prisoner-detention cases. You can follow an ongoing dialogue between Dahlia Lithwick and Walter Dellinger as they discuss these. Lithwick states:

The photos accompanying these stories on the front pages will all be of alleged terrorists, even though these cases are really all about the president. …

I have this mental image that I cannot shake: The war on terror rolls inexorably along, crushing out basic rights and freedoms as the judges puff along on the sidelines, robes flapping ineffectually, trying to stop this machine that is the Pentagon, the Bush administration, and the Justice Department. We are now poised at the exact moment when the court really could stop that machine, or slow it down, or at least peek in a window. This is breathtaking when you think about it.

Dellinger points out the following Nixon quote: “Well, when the President does it, that means it is not illegal.”

Yikes.

Tune in Monday.