Hernandez v. Robles

“We hold that the New York Constitution does not compel recognition of marriages between members of the same sex. Whether such marriages should be recognized is a question to be addressed by the Legislature.”

I feel ill. More than I expected to.

Here is the decision.

5 thoughts on “Hernandez v. Robles

  1. I’m not a lawyer like you, but it seems the opposite of what the court in Mass. thought. Over there, it seemed to me, they decided that since gays could adopt, etc., the lack of marriage rights was arbitrary discrimination — which is the kind of thing courts are better at seeing than lawmakers.

    I don’t know enough to understand why the New York judges didn’t see the samething.

Comments are closed.