Obama’s Speech II

Many people have praised the speech Obama gave yesterday. But other reactions to it have left me depressed.

I used to be optimistic and idealistic about the power of dialogue to change the world. If we could all empathize with other people more, I thought, the world would be a better place. (Empathize: identify with, and understand, another’s situation, feelings, and motives.)

I used to think that only children were in thrall to their fears and emotions, and that when they grew up into adulthood, the fear would go away, and it would be replaced by understanding.

But it strikes me that so many adults in this world are actually just children in grown-up bodies. They are people who can lift heavy objects, and reach the top shelf, and drive a car, and hold down a job, and make a living, and raise a family. They are people who can generally function in this world day to day, independently. And yet so many of these people haven’t really grown up. They’re still too much in thrall to their fears and emotions. And it prevents them from understanding the world. From knowing the world. From knowing the people in it.

Obama gave a wonderful speech yesterday — a speech, by the way, that he apparently wrote himself. (That shouldn’t be so surprising. After all, he wrote a highly-praised, nuanced and deeply felt book back in 1995, when he wasn’t a politician and wouldn’t have had motivation to use a ghostwriter. And he was editor-in-chief of the Harvard Law Review, so he’s not exactly an idiot. Maybe he received input on the speech from others — I haven’t seen it reported that he did, but maybe he did — but even if he did, the thoughts were his. It’s not like someone pushed a sheaf of paper in front of him and said, “Read this.”)

It’s not an easy speech to digest. You have to do a little more work to understand it than you have to do with most politicians’ speeches. It’s only words, but it demonstrated a fine understanding of the racial divisions that contribute so much to mutual suspicion and animosity in our country today. And, not incidentally, Obama also did a fine job, I thought, of explaining that sometimes, you have emotional ties to people in your life who may say things and hold beliefs that you profoundly disagree with. You might choose to shun these people. Or you might choose not to shun them, because even though you disagree with them, they’ve become like family to you, and you prefer not to shun family.

And yet some people think it’s their place to judge Obama for the choice he’s made.

I was particularly frustrated by a comment to a post on Eric’s blog. (I don’t know Ryan, the commenter, so I take issue only with his words, and only because those words are representative of what other people have written elsewhere on various blogs in the past 24 hours. I don’t mean to criticize the commenter himself.)

Ryan wrote:

I did read the speech. And I still don’t care. Actions speak louder than words and as a gay, I walked away from hateful religon, so can Obama, esp. when “unity” is his buzz words. So the world being complicated doesn’t “cut the mustard” so to speak. Wright is wrong. Obama sat and listened to his spew for 20 years. There’s no excuse. None.

[…]

Obama’s ACTIONS have spoken louder than any fancy speech his writers write. He supports hateful Wright, for whatever reason Wright is angry. I care not.

Hate is wrong. Wright preaches hate. Obama supports that hate by donating to his church, by attending his sermons, by naming his book after one of those sermons, by bringing his daughters to hear him preach.

End of discussion.

End of discussion?

That’s a level of certitude I can’t imagine holding. About almost anything.

I’m tired of reading comments by people who think it’s their place to judge how another human being handles a particular situation. As I said, I’ve seen similar comments on numerous blogs in the last 24 hours, and it frustrates me to no end. People are coming to a situation with their preconceived notions, and they won’t let anything change their minds.

I’ve been guilty of this myself, of course. In this political season, I’ve felt a visceral dislike of Hillary Clinton over the last couple of months, and I’ve expressed it on this blog. I’ve been trying to combat that dislike. I can’t presume to know what’s in her heart or her mind. I don’t think she’s an Ambitious Dragon Lady; I think she has deeply held, deeply felt beliefs about health care, and about children, and about making this country a better place. I don’t know if she has the political skill to achieve her goals as president; she might be deluding herself, as all politicians do (including, perhaps, Obama). And I think she’s made some dishonorable political choices in this campaign. My primal instinct is to hate her guts and hold her in contempt for the way she’s conducted it. But I’m trying to get past that, because, really, what the hell do I know?

“What the hell do I know.” I wish more people lived by that creed instead of feeling secure in their certitude. I try to, even though I’m not nearly as successful at it as I’d like to be.

There have always been wars and there always will be. There have always been dictators who weren’t loved enough or secure enough as a child, and there always will be. Throughout history, a large portion of the human population has remained childlike, and a large portion of the human population always will.

Why bother with the dialogue and the words? What good can it do? Damned if I know sometimes.

While writing this, it was pointed out to me that tomorrow would have been Mr. Rogers’s 80th birthday. (In his honor, tomorrow is “Won’t You Wear a Sweater?” Day.)

I adored Mr. Rogers as a child; sometimes he seemed to be the only person in the world who wouldn’t judge me, who would accept me unconditionally. He taught us some of the most emotionally healthy lessons there are. Here are some:

Of course, I get angry. Of course, I get sad. I have a full range of emotions. I also have a whole smorgasbord of ways of dealing with my feelings. That is what we should give children. Give them … ways to express their rage without hurting themselves or somebody else. That’s what the world needs.

You know, you don’t have to look like everybody else to be acceptable and to feel acceptable.

I have a very modulated way of dealing with my anger. I have always tried to understand the other person and invariably I’ve discovered that somebody who rubs you the wrong way has been rubbed the wrong way many times.

If more people were like Mr. Rogers, the world would be a better place.

5 thoughts on “Obama’s Speech II

  1. I haven’t been blogging much lately. I’m actually considering giving it up altogether. I’ve been spending doing most of my online debating on Beliefnet’s Jewish forums, I’ve been encountering the same damn thing.

    Several people keep saying they “have a gut feeling” about Obama, that he’ll be “bad for the Jews” and bring up the same facile argument as that commenter you quoted. It is so defeating. So deenergizing.

    I’m glad I’m not a friend or family member of any of these people — since they apparently will cut off and isolate anyone who expresses an opinion they disagree with. I’m sure it much more simplistic to go through life with such blazing black-and-white clarity, to reduce everyone in the world to 2-dimensional cariactures of a single feature to be dismissed at whim. Followed to its logical conclusion, though, it must also be pretty lonely.

    It baffles me that so many people are unable to grasp the fact the every human being has multiple facets and roles in life. Wright has been a spiritual guide, mentor, and friend to Obama for years — a person he obviously shares a very deep bond with. Does that mean, then, that Obama is obligated to agree with Wright on everything and that if Wright expresses a distasteful opinion Obama is obligated to cut him out of his life forever?

    Obama made a great point about his grandmother: should he disown her because she would make racist comments?

    I am convinced that if Obama were white and had a nice comfortable WASPy name none of this would be an issue. This is nothing but racism and xenophobia attempting to put a legitimate fact on.

    GLBT people, Jews, and GLBT Jews have been the victims of such smear campaigns throughout history and I think we have a moral obligation to resist such vile attacks now when directed as others.

    I wish, though, I could say that this ruins my faith in humanity. I don’t have any faith in humanity. I have come to expect that everyone is a childish boorish sheep unless proven otherwise and to not be surprised by such collossal stupidity as displayed in thie Obamania. The people get the government we deserve and this idiocy doesn’t do much to allay my fears for the future of the Republic.

  2. Let’s just pretend Obama gave the best speech in the history of mankind. Does that make him the best person for President? I think not.

  3. The problem with a nuanced response is this (and this is in no way meant to be an attack on Obama or his speech). We need more than a speech. We need a real, honest, rational dialogue in this country about race. It’s not going to happen and, unfortunately, I’m not sure that Obama a.) wanted his speech to open that dialogue and b.) that people would use it as an opportunity to do so anyway.
    It’s easy to say “we’re all racist” or “we’re working on it. Look how far we’ve come!” and let that be that.
    Oppression, while it hasn’t really worked both ways in this country in terms of color and race, definitely still has legs here on both sides of the division. No one wants to have a dialogue about it. White people don’t want to hear from blacks that, yes, race still keeps some people down. And most whites won’t admit that they think things like affirmative action keep them unemployed or make it unfair against them.
    There’s no real way to move forward until people can admit that – maybe not always, but sometimes – we make wide judgments based on race. It doesn’t make us bad people, but it’s also not something to dismiss or ignore as a passing little thing.

    The real issue here, unfortunately, is how much I fear the incredible right-wing smear machine’s ability to open up white fear to really trash Obama now. I hope that, having started this dialogue, he can confront it head-on if it rears its head.
    The REAL thing I find disheartening, though, is that Obama, as a presidential contender, really has other things to do with his time than lead this country in a moment of racial healing, like solving legislative and financial problems that the power of the presidency is actually equipped to handle. A president (or candidate) can’t be the lone voice trying to open this kind of dialogue.

Comments are closed.