Health Care

Health care reform has me dejected, but this bill needs to pass. We can’t “kill the bill.”

I’m annoyed at Obama for not risking political capital to fight for what he believes in. More importantly, I have nothing but contempt for Harry Reid. I blame Reid for this fiasco more than Obama. If not for this ridiculous notion that any bill needs 60 votes to pass the Senate, we would have a much better health care bill today. The idea that Democrats are being allowed to threaten to filibuster their own party’s legislation is absurd. Are you kidding me? The way I see it: you want to filibuster your own party’s legislation? You want to pull that kind of shit? Fine, then you’re getting stripped of all your committee chairmanships and any other special perks you get from being a member of the majority party. I’d rather have 53 Democratic senators led by the ass-kicking Lyndon Johnson than a 60-member majority led by Harry Reid, that milquetoast fuckwad. Any time Reid opens his mouth I want to grab him by the shoulders and shake him awake. He practically whispers in front of the microphone. He barely looks at the camera. He’d lose a fight against a ham sandwich. You could run him over with a tricycle. The guy has less charisma than John Kerry. He has negative charisma.

Fortunately, he’s up for re-election next year and he’ll probably lose. Since it’s unlikely the Democrats will lose their majority next year, we’ll probably have a new Democratic majority leader in the next Congress. But by that point it will be too late to put together a better health care plan.

Which is why, as disappointed I am in the Senate bill as it now stands, I’m more annoyed with people on the left who say we need to “kill the bill.” If we don’t pass a bill now, we won’t have this chance for another 15-20 years. And there are some great things in this bill. For starters, under this bill, 30 million more Americans will have health insurance. Some people on the left are saying that because there’s no public option, it will be a windfall to the insurance companies. Um, no it won’t. In return for being paid premiums, the insurance companies will have to provide health insurance to people. It seems like many lefties aren’t thinking clearly — they’re beholden to the notion that anything corporate is evil, that health insurance companies are the spawn of hell. They’re more interested in punishing insurance companies than in helping millions of Americans get health insurance. They think that if insurance companies benefit, that must mean that everyone else loses. But be real. Just because you hate insurance companies, doesn’t mean they are evil. The world is not in line with your emotional reality. It’s really immature to see the world through the eyes of Michael Moore. I don’t like it when right-wingers see the world as black and white, and I don’t like it when left-wingers do so either.

It’s the Nader voters all over again.

Furthermore, one of the problems with our health insurance system is that lots of healthy people don’t buy insurance, meaning that the risk pool is smaller and somewhat skewed toward the unhealthy. A bigger risk pool is better, because it results in lower premiums for everyone. And the risk pools will increase by 30 million people.

Even if these numbers are off and it’s just 20 million more people with health insurance, that’s still phenomenal, and it’s the greatest progress in health care that we’ve had in more than 40 years.

I also read something that said under the current bill, insurance companies will be able to charge older people three times as much as younger people, and OMG how horrible that would be. Um, as opposed to now, when there is no limit on what they can charge?

So, yes, this bill could have been a lot better, and it’s Obama’s fault as well as Reid’s, as well as the fault of every senator who opposes a public option and a Medicare buy-in. (It’s also the Republicans’ fault, of course, but that goes without saying.)

But there’s lots of great stuff in this bill. It needs to pass. In the early 1970s, the Democrats scrapped a health care deal with Richard Nixon because it wasn’t good enough for them, and what did they get for it? Nothing.

If they don’t pass this bill now, there won’t be another chance for years.

5 thoughts on “Health Care

  1. I think that was generally discussed in the context of confirming judicial appointments. I don’t think Harry Reid has the balls to discuss it in the context of health care.

  2. It would be a relatively simple thing to do, but you’re right. Reid has no balls and no spine either. He’s a jellyfish.

    However, there is another side to the coin: while the 60-vote issue prevents legislation that we support, it also prevents legislation that we would oppose.

  3. The present Administration’s whole attitude towards Congress is completely antithetical to the “nuclear option.” Unlike the BushEra, the current President has opted to treat the senate and congress with equal status; Gone are the late-night/early-morn calls that (literally) started with screaming for this or that legislator to “get in line.” Bullying (and threats) are no longer the modus operandi of the Executive for the current term.

    Obama, and Reid, are above the nuclear option — and now, also, is Rahm Emanuel.

    rob@egoz.org

  4. Thank you for a thoughtful post on this matter. I agree with you on all points. I wish we had a better bill, but know this is what we do have, and it needs to become law.

    There is never a perfect piece of legislation. Lord knows that the current health bill now set for a vote before Christmas would be far superior if it had a firm public option in it. But as with every bill there is the ‘half-a-loaf’ argument that needs consideration.

    For decades Senator Ted Kennedy championed health care concerns in this nation. He would be the first to say that you take a whack at the issue, fight hard, and then take the best bill that can be passed and signed into law. Then you get back into the legislative committees and draft another bill to fight for in order to strengthen what already has been passed. That is the hard work that great senators like Kennedy engaged in every day of their careers.

    Ted Kennedy would have thought, as we all now do, that this process with President Obama, and the Democratic Congress should have produced a stronger bill. But he also would have known that at the end of the political process the best of what was able to be created was deserving of a vote.

Comments are closed.